WebHarrods v Harrodian School [1996] RPC 697 (CA) C was a well-known department store, D's school was on the site of the store's former sports ground. C sued in passing-off. … WebINTENTION NOT NECESSARY While most passing off cases involve a deliberate attempt to take advantage of the goodwill owned by another trader, a fraudulent motive is not necessary on the part of the D to establish a claim Harrods v. Harrodian School [1996] RPC 697, Millett LJ: ‘[I]t is not necessary for a plaintiff to establish that the defendant …

Suggested Answers to the Questions in Chapter 8 - Oxford …

WebIn Associated Newspapers v Insert Media [1991] FSR 380, the Court of Appeal held that where the defendant inserted advertising leaflets without permission inside magazines published by the claimant, the public would assume that the material had been approved or authorised by the claimant. In United Biscuits (UK) Ltd v Asda Stores Ltd, WebJun 9, 2012 · This argument is equally asserted in the case of Harrods Ltd. V Harrodian School Ltd. [1996] RPC 697 where Millet LJ held at 706: ‘ Deception is the gist of the tort of passing off , but it is not necessary for a plaintiff to establish that the defendant consciously intended to deceive the public if that is the probable result of his conduct. inconsistency\u0027s g9

Understanding Passing Off The Student Lawyer

WebBritish Sugar Plc v James Robertson Sons [1996] RPC 281 Pianotist Co’s Application (1906) RPC 774 Kellogg Co. v Pacific Food Product Sdn [1999] 2 SLR 651 ... Harrods v Harrodian School [1996] RPC 697 Hyundai Mobis v Mobil Petroleum Company Inc [2007] SGIPOS 12 CDL Hotels International Limited v Pontiac Marina Pte Ltd [1998] 2 SLR 550 ... WebHarrods Ltd v Harrodian School Ltd England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Apr 2, 1996 Subsequent References CaseIQ TM (AI Recommendations) Harrods Ltd v … inconsistency\u0027s gl